At Fresco Law, we understand that legal disputes can significantly impact your business operations, finances, and relationships. Our team is dedicated to helping you navigate these challenges efficiently and effectively, always aligning our approach with your business objectives.

Some of the services we provide clients relating to disputes and litigation

  • Partnership and shareholder disputes
  • Contract disputes
  • Commercial lease disputes
  • Intellectual property infringements
  • Employment disputes
  • Franchising disputes
  • Debt recovery

Key Points To Know

  1. Dispute resolution encompasses various methods used to resolve conflicts between parties, including negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and litigation. These mechanisms are designed to address disputes efficiently and minimize disruption to business operations.
  2. Negotiation is often the first step in resolving disputes. It involves direct discussions between the parties to reach a mutually acceptable resolution. This approach is cost-effective and maintains business relationships. However, it often requires a willingness to compromise from both sides. Negotiation can be advantageous as it allows for flexible solutions and quicker resolutions. It is particularly useful when parties have an ongoing relationship that they wish to preserve.
  3. Mediation involves a neutral third party, known as a mediator, who helps facilitate discussions and guide the parties towards a resolution. The mediator does not make binding decisions but assists in finding common ground. Mediation can be beneficial for resolving disputes where parties are open to compromise. This is the case because it is less adversarial than litigation and can lead to creative solutions that might not be available through court decisions. Mediation is also generally quicker and less expensive than litigation.
  4. Although less flexibility than mediation, parties can obtain a definitive resolution using arbitration – a formal process where a neutral third party, known as an arbitrator, hears evidence from both sides and makes a binding decision. It is often used when parties seek a quicker binding resolution than formal litigation but without the formality of court procedures.
  5. Litigation involves taking a dispute to court, where a judge or jury makes a binding decision based on legal arguments and evidence. It is often considered a last resort due to its complexity and expense. Litigation provides a formal resolution with the authority of the court. It is appropriate for cases where other methods have failed or where legal precedent is necessary. However, it can be time-consuming and costly, and the outcome is less predictable compared to alternative dispute resolution methods.
  6. Contractual provisions play a critical role in shaping how disputes are resolved. Well-drafted contracts can include clauses that specify the preferred method of dispute resolution, the applicable laws, and the jurisdiction that will have authority to hear the dispute. These provisions help manage potential conflicts and provide a clear framework for resolution

FAQs

The costs of mediation and arbitration are usually shared between the parties involved in the dispute, unless otherwise specified in the contract. In mediation, fees for the mediator and any associated costs are generally split equally. For arbitration, the costs can include the arbitrator’s fees, administrative fees, and any expenses related to the arbitration proceedings. Contracts may have specific provisions that allocate these costs differently, and in some cases, the losing party may be required to cover all expenses. It is essential for parties to review their contracts to understand the financial obligations related to dispute resolution.

To ensure that dispute resolution clauses are enforceable, businesses should:

  • Be Specific: Clearly outline the preferred dispute resolution methods, including details on procedures, timelines, and any specific rules or institutions (e.g., the International Chamber of Commerce for arbitration).
  • Follow Legal Standards: Ensure the clauses comply with relevant laws and regulations. In some jurisdictions, specific formalities must be met for arbitration agreements to be enforceable.
  • Mutual Agreement: Make sure that all parties explicitly agree to the dispute resolution provisions. This is typically achieved through clear language and mutual consent when signing the contract.
  • Severability Clause: Include a severability clause stating that if any part of the dispute resolution clause is found to be invalid, the remainder will still be enforceable.
  • Consult Legal Experts: Engage legal professionals to draft or review dispute resolution clauses to ensure they are comprehensive and legally sound

Yes, parties can choose a combination of dispute resolution methods in their contracts. This approach is known as a multi-tiered or step-clause dispute resolution. For example, a contract may require parties to first attempt negotiation, then proceed to mediation if negotiation fails, and finally move to arbitration or litigation if mediation does not resolve the issue. This tiered approach can offer a structured and escalating method for resolving disputes, allowing parties multiple opportunities to settle conflicts before resorting to more formal and costly processes.

While arbitration offers several advantages, there are potential downsides to consider:

  • Costs: Arbitration can be expensive, especially if the process is prolonged or involves multiple arbitrators.
  • Limited Appeal: Arbitration decisions are typically final and binding, with very limited grounds for appeal, which can be disadvantageous if the decision is unfavorable.
  • Discovery Limitations: Arbitration may offer limited discovery compared to litigation, which can affect the ability to gather evidence.
  • Enforceability Issues: While arbitration awards are generally enforceable, complications can arise when enforcing awards in different jurisdictions.
  • Potential for Bias: Concerns about the impartiality of arbitrators, especially if one party is a repeat user of certain arbitration services, can impact perceived fairness.

Businesses should carefully weigh these potential downsides when deciding to include arbitration clauses in their contracts.

Factors that help in selecting whether litigation should be pursued over other dispute resolution methods in certain circumstances are:

  • Complex Legal Issues: When a dispute involves intricate legal questions that require judicial interpretation.
  • Enforceability: If a legally binding and enforceable decision is necessary, especially in cases where the opposing party may not voluntarily comply with an arbitration award or mediated agreement.
  • Precedent: When a business seeks to establish a legal precedent that may benefit it in future disputes.
  • Uncooperative Parties: If the opposing party is unwilling to participate in negotiation, mediation, or arbitration, litigation may be the only viable option.
  • Severe Breaches: In cases of significant breaches of contract or serious misconduct, litigation can provide a formal and structured process for resolution.

Litigation provides a definitive legal resolution but is often more time-consuming and costly compared to other dispute resolution methods.

Make an enquiry

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Name
By submitting this form, you agree to Fresco Law’s privacy policy and terms of use. You also agree to receive emails from Fresco Law and can unsubscribe at any time.

Make an enquiry

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
By submitting this form, you agree to Fresco Law’s privacy policy and terms of use. You also agree to receive emails from Fresco Law and can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact us today
find out how we can help

Contact Us Now Button